EuraMost RSS

ÁÅË/ÐÓÑBelorussian Online Newspaper 2010-09-09 02:38

    Politics         Economics         Europe         People         Theme         Regions        
 
 
 

Andrey Kazakievich: “Belarus today’s relations with European Union is a balance within an acceptable corridor”



On November 2 the ambassadors of EU countries met Vladimir Makey the head of the President’s Administration. The ambassador of Poland Henryk Litwin told journalists that it was a routine meeting at which the cooperation perspectives of Belarus and European Union were discussed. Litwin also noted that this meeting “didn’t have any connection to the EU Council” which will consider the question of visa sanctions in the case of Belarusian officials. The reporter of www.Euramost.org asked politologists Andrey Kazakievich to comment on the meeting.

- Maybe they didn’t talk about anything important at this meeting, but isn’t it some kind of signal to Belarusian opposition? These meetings seem to become working meetings in fact.

- Indeed, such contacts become usual and there is nothing extraordinary in it. Something we call “improvement of relations of Belarus and EU countries” lasts already a year. Such improvement means direct contacts between the representatives of these countries and Belarusian authorities. And as for the importance of these meeting for our opposition, the situation has really changed a lot: European countries have partially legitimated Belarusian regime. And every political party must recon with it in one or another extent. But this doesn’t mean that Europe refuses those conditions which it laid down to the regime before that. Europe will continue demanding graduate democratization f Belarus and opposition can play a certain role in this process.



- Litvin states that nothing was told about the sanctions against Belarusian officials and the question will be decided this month. Does the Administration try to impress and to turn the scale in deciding of this question to their own side by agreeing to take part in these meetings?

- It’s quite possible that the official topics of these meetings will be different: for example the perspective of cooperation of Belarus and European Union. But anyway Belarusian side will rouse the question of lifting the sanctions against Belarusian officials. It’s not essential actually from the functional point of view but it’s a very important symbolic factor. Lately we don’t have any direct critics of Belarus from European countries. And Belarusian authorities can count on graduate lifting of the sanctions. Perhaps they will be lifted now or withhold.



-Shall we expect that in the case of lifting of sanctions Lukashenko will “tour” around Europe?

- Lifting of sanctions first will indicate de facto that Europe believes that the situation with human rights in Belarus improved. This will give an opportunity to improve foreign political status of Belarus. As for the voyages, it won’t be a “tour”. But the visits are being planned. And the reasons are needed: negotiations, making up decisions… There were informal and formal contacts over the course of the year. And they will be in future. They don’t need a tour for the sake of tour. With all the sanctions we don’t see a complete isolation of Belarusian officials.



- There is an impression that EU aims to involve Belarus to the sphere of its influence and nothing can influence this decision, no matter what Lukashenko does. Are there any limits at all?

- Well, there are some certain limits of cause. European Union is ready to lead such policy towards Belarus until it takes rapid actions which can be characterized as repressive. And it won’t necessarily be a question of democratization or liberalization but the questions of minimal standards of freedom of political processes, human rights and so on will still be important. They will insist on not appliance of repressions towards opposition such as criminal responsibility, brutal treatment of mass media and so on. But this doesn’t foresee an obligatory liberalization of information market and absolutely free and clear elections. It’s a balance within an acceptable corridor. They look for tolerance from the Belarusian authorities. If actions are harsh and radical the relations will take a turn for the worse.



Vasil SLUSHNY


 
  Article has no comments
 
Name:
E-mail:
Comment:


Enter code:  

Use of juvenile, nonsensical and vulgar language prohibited.
 
 
 
 
 



 
 
Europe
RUSTIS KAMUNTAVICIUS: “We have an idea that Belarusian historian would right Lithuanian history and Lithuanian historian would write Belarusian history”.
2010 08 10
The Institute of the Great Duchy of Lithuania (http://ldk.clio.lt/by) was created on November 26, 2009 in Kaunas. The main goal f the institute is to understand the heritage of GDL, to study and popul >>

Eropean Union insists on five positions for profound cooperation with Belarus.
2010 07 09
On July 9 the visit of European Commissioner on the questions of European good-neighbor policy Stefan Fuhle to Belarus finished. The same day he met with journalists in “Europa” hotel. The meeting of >>

Another portion of “comprehensive cooperation”?
2010 06 12
Full-scale cooperation of European Union and Belarus in the framework of the program “Eastern partnership” is important for the development of democracy and supremacy of law in our country. This was t >>

“Belarusian ruling power got more from Europe…”
2010 03 31
“Belarus and European Union have great expectations from the interrelations: our partners in Brussels are not completely satisfied, but, what is also important, the main expectations of Belarus haven’ >>

Denis Mielyantsov: “NATO is not a “monster” for Belarus”
2010 03 06
This year the first NATO maneuvers are going to take place in the Baltic air space on March 17-20. Is NATO still a “menacing military monster” for Belarus? How do Belarusians see the North Atlantic al >>


 
 
 
Current Archive   1

 
 
© 2002 — 2010 Euramost.orginfo@euramost.org